Accuracy of sonographic identification of suprascapular nerve at supraclavicular fossa: a cadaveric study / Precisión de la identificación ecográfica del nervio supraescapular en la fosa supraclavicular: un estudio cadavérico

SUMMARY: Sonographic identification of suprascapular nerve (SSN) is essential for diagnosis of suprascapular neuropathy and ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block. This study aims to demonstrate the accuracy of identification of SSN at supraclavicular region by ultrasonography in fresh cadavers. Ninety-three posterior cervical triangles were examined. With ultrasonography, SSN emerging from the upper trunk of brachial plexus was identified and followed until it passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Sonographic visualization of SSN in supraclavicular fossa was recorded. Then, cadaveric dissection was performed to determine the presence or absence of SSN. An agreement between sonographic identification and direct visualization was specified and categorized the following three patterns: "correctly identified" (pattern I), "incorrectly identified" (pattern II), and "unidentified" (pattern III). The identification of SSN using sonography was correct in almost 90 %. The diameter of SSN with pattern I was the largest compared to those of other two patterns. In pattern I, SSN ran laterally from the upper trunk of brachial plexus and passed underneath the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. Therefore, SSN was easily identified under ultrasonography. In pattern II, nerve identified by ultrasonography was literally the dorsal scapular nerve. In pattern III, SSN was unable to be identified because of its anatomical variation. The accuracy of ultrasonographic identification of SSN at supraclavicular fossa is high and the key sonoanatomical landmarks are the lateral margin of brachial plexus and the inferior belly of omohyoid muscle. The anatomical variants of SSN are reasons of incorrect or unable identification of SSN under ultrasonography.

RESUMEN: La identificación ecográfica del nervio supraescapular (NSE) es esencial para el diagnóstico de neuropatía supraescapular y bloqueo del nervio supraescapular mediante la ecografía. Este estudio tiene como objetivo demostrar la precisión de la identificación de NSE en la región supraclavicular por ecografía en cadáveres frescos. Se examinaron noventa y tres triángulos cervicales posteriores. Se identificó el NSE emergente de la parte superior del tronco del plexo braquial con la ecografía, y se siguió hasta su trayecto por debajo del vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Se registró la visualización ecográfica del NSE en la fosa supraclavicular. Luego, se realizó disección cadavérica para determinar la presencia o ausencia de NSE. Se especificó un acuerdo entre la identificación ecográfica y la visualización directa y se categorizaron los siguientes tres patrones: "identificado correctamente" (patrón I), "identificado incorrectamente" (patrón II) y "no identificado" (patrón III). La identificación de NSE mediante ecografía fue correcta en casi el 90 %. El diámetro del NSE con el patrón I fue el más grande en comparación con los de los otros dos patrones. En el patrón I, NSE corría lateralmente desde la parte superior del tronco del plexo braquial y pasaba por debajo del vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Por lo tanto, el NSE se identificó fácilmente mediante ecografía. En el patrón II, el nervio identificado por ecografía era literalmente el nervio escapular dorsal; en el patrón III, el NSE no pudo ser identificado debido a su variación anatómica. La precisión de la identificación ecográfica del NSE en la fosa supraclavicular es alta y los puntos de referencia sonoanatómicos clave son el borde lateral del plexo braquial y el vientre inferior del músculo omohioideo. Las variantes anatómicas de NSE son razones de identificación incorrecta o incapaz de NSE bajo ecografía.

Bloqueo de nervios periféricos guiados por ecografía en pacientes con hemofilia / Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks in hemophilia with patients

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a coagulation disorder; it is a recessive disease linked to the X chromosome. In patients with hemophilia (PWH), regional anesthetic blocks have been considered a contraindication. Safety has been increased by performing them guided by Ultrasound. The objective of our work is to show our experience in PWH and peripheral nerve blocks. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 41 PWH were operated under regional analgesia with Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks associated with general anesthesia in the period 2006-2019. All patients were Hemophilia A. Three patients had inhibitors. The mean age was 35 years. 40 lower limb blocks and 2 upper limb blocks were performed. The Sonosite® equipment model Micromaxx was used. RESULTS: All patients presented adequate peripheral nerve block for an average time of 12.5 hours (8-24). There were no complications. CONCLUSIÓN: The present study shows that Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks in PCH is a safe procedure, which reduces the requirements of opioids and the side effects of them, improving the postoperative period and the recovery of patients.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La hemofilia es un trastorno de la coagulación, es una enfermedad recesiva ligada al cromosoma X. En pacientes con hemofilia (PCH) los bloqueos regionales anestésicos se han considerado una contraindicación. Se ha aumentado la seguridad realizándolos guiados por Ecografía. El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es mostrar nuestra experiencia en PCH y bloqueos de nervios periféricos. MATERRIAL Y MÉTODO: 41 PCH fueron operados bajo analgesia regional con Bloqueos de Nervios Periféricos Guiados por Ecografía asociado a la anestesia general en el período 2006-2019. Todos los pacientes eran hemofilia A. Tres pacientes presentaban inhibidores. La edad media fue de 35 años. Se realizaron 40 bloqueos de miembros inferiores y 2 bloqueos miembros superiores. Se utilizó el equipo Sonosite® modelo Micromaxx. RESULTADOS: Todos los pacientes presentaron adecuado bloqueo de nervio periférico durante un tiempo promedio de 12,5 h (8-24). No se presentaron complicaciones. CONCLUSIÓN: El presente estudio muestra que los Bloqueos de Nervios Periféricos Guiados por Ecografía en PCH es un procedimiento seguro, que reduce los requisitos de los opioides y los efectos secundarios de ellos, mejorando el posoperatorio y la recuperación de los pacientes.

Mapeamento comparativo de nervos periféricos em caninos e bovinos / Comparative mapping of peripheral nerves in dogs and cattle

O estudo dos dados anatômicos é fundamental para possibilitar ao médico veterinário o reconhecimento de pequenas estruturas, como os nervos nos animais, oferecendo subsídio para construção do conhecimento do profissional principalmente em técnicas anestésicas e cirúrgicas. Para investigar e mapear os nervos do plexo braquial (nervo radial, nervo musculocutâneo, nervo ulnar, nervo mediano), nervo isquiático, nervo tibial, nervo femoral e os nervos para bloqueio paravertebral, foram utilizados um cadáver canino adulto, de peso aproximado de 8kg, e um cadáver de bezerro Holandês, de peso aproximado de 40kg. O mapeamento dos nervos é de grande importância, já que conhecer bem essas estruturas permite ao veterinário um bom desenvolvimento de suas atividades profissionais a fim de exercer funções mais complexas durante a anestesia e cirurgia veterinária, uma vez que, identificados os pontos de referência anatômicos, é possível trabalhar com mais clareza nas técnicas de bloqueios dos nervos periféricos.(AU)

Knowledge of animal anatomy is essential for the veterinarian to identify small structures such as nerves, thus providing a solid background for the professional especially for surgical and anesthetic techniques. To investigate and map the nerves of the brachial plexus (radial, musculocutaneous, ulnar, median), sciatic, tibial, femoral and the nerves for paravertebral blocking in bovine, embalmed specimens were used. One adult male dog weighing approximately 8kg and one 40kg male calf were used. Nerve mapping is fundamental due to its interdisciplinary nature, thus providing the veterinarian with a major improvement in his/her professional activities which permits allows one to perform complex tasks in anesthesia and veterinary surgery. Knowledge ofanatomical reference points increases clarity and precision in techniques involving peripheral nerve blocks.(AU)

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration

PURPOSE: We compared three methods of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block, which were single, and double perivascular (PV) infiltration techniques, and a perineural (PN) injection technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II undergoing surgery of the forearm, wrist, or hand were randomly allocated to three groups. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 5 microg/mL was used. The PN group (n=26) received injections at the median, ulnar, and radial nerve with 8 mL for each nerve. The PV1 group (n=26) received a single injection of 24 mL at 12-o'clock position of the axillary artery. The PV2 group (n=26) received two injections of 12 mL each at 12-o'clock and 6-o'clock position. For all groups, musculocutaneous nerve was blocked separately. RESULTS: The PN group (391.2+/-171.6 sec) had the longest anesthetic procedure duration than PV1 (192.8+/-59.0 sec) and PV2 (211.4+/-58.6 sec). There were no differences in onset time. The average induction time was longer in PN group (673.4+/-149.6 sec) than PV1 (557.6+/-194.9 sec) and PV2 (561.5+/-129.8 sec). There were no differences in the success rate (89.7% vs. 86.2% vs. 89.7%). CONCLUSION: The PV injection technique consisting of a single injection in 12-o'clock position above the axillary artery in addition to a musculocutaneous nerve block is equally effective and less time consuming than the PN technique. Therefore, the PV technique is an alternative method that may be used in busy clinics or for difficult cases.